Appeal No. 109 of 2007 Personal Circumstances – Contrary Opinion – Proof of the dissenting opinion of the judgment is not an disclosure of the secret of deliberation and does not invalidate the judgment

This post is also available in: العربية (Arabic)

Appeal No. 109 of 2007 Personal Status
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Headed by Judge Zaki Ibrahim Al-Masri, Head of the Department
And the membership of the judges Ahmed Abdul Rahman Al Zawawi, Mohammed Khamis Al-Bassiouni, Sayed Abdul Rahim Al-Shimi and Abdul Wahab Saleh Hamouda

(34)

(1) The ruling on “sentencing- deliberation and pronouncement of the judgment”.
The verdict was issued by a majority of the opinions of the judges who participated in the case and the proof of the case and the proof of the offending judge his opinion in the draft judgment is permissible. Article (128) Civil proceedings. This leads: Proving the dissenting opinion of the ruling is not an disclosure of the secret of deliberation, It does not invalidate the verdict.

(2) “Applications in the case”. The trial court has “authority in the claims.”
Request the discount. The lesson is to define the truth of what he meant without adhering to the words and phrases he used. The court’s obligation to give the case the right and proper legal adaptation applicable to the relationship between the parties in accordance with the fact that it is required and the facts it shows as long as it does not change the content of these requests and does not introduce new requests that the opponent has not made.

(3) Personal status “Matters concerning Muslims- maintenance – rent of housing”.
And to me the concubines. His commitment to rent a nursery. Exception: The incubator has a residence where you live or intend to live in. The housing of her son. What is it?

(4) Ruling on “defects of evidence – error in the application of the law”. Personal status “Matters concerning Muslims – maintenance – rent of housing.
The appellant requested that the impugned against him prepare and provide an furnished nursery and pay his annual wages, including the value of water and electricity consumption. It is guaranteed by a request that she be paid for a nursery. This request was rejected. Error in law enforcement

Appeal No. 109 of 2007 Personal Status – Contrary Opinion – Proof of the dissenting opinion of the judgment is not an disclosure of the secret of the.pdf (282.9 KB, views 16)

Previous Post
Appeal No. 16 of 2008 Personal Circumstances – condition of divorce pending the action or abandonment of something
Next Post
Appeal No. 30 of 2008 S3 B.C.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Menu